Fentress, On the Block: Cataste, Chalcidica and Cryptae in Early Imperial Italy, JRA 18, 2005, 220–234. Search in Google Scholarįent ress (2005) E. de Melo, Plautus I, II, Cambridge (MA) 2011. Economic Relationships, Economic History Review 30, 1977, 42–52. Search in Google ScholarĬrawford (1977) M. H. Cottier et al., The Customs Law of Asia, Oxford 2008. Search in Google ScholarĬottier (2008) M. Search in Google ScholarĬornish (1988) F. W. Cooley – M. G. L Cooley, Pompeii and Herculaneum: A Sourcebook, London 22005. Search in Google ScholarĬooley – Cooley (2 014) A. E. Coarelli, L’Agora des Italiens lo statarion di Delo, JRA 18, 2005, 197–212. Search in Google ScholarĬoarelli (2005) F. Camodeca, Tabulae Herculanenses: riedizione delle emptiones di schiavi (TH 5), in: U. Search in Google ScholarĬamodeca (2000) G. Bruun, Water, Oxygen Isotopes, and Immigration to Ostia-Portus, JRA 23, 2010, 109–132. Bosworth, Vespasian and the Slave Trade, CQ 52, 2002, 350–357. Search in Google Scholarīosworth (2002) A. B. Riley, The Natural History of Pliny, London 1855. Bodel, Caveat emptor: Towards a Study of Roman Slave-traders, JRA 18, 2005, 181–195. Boak, The Magistri of Campania and Delos, CPh 11, 1916, 25–45. Search in Google Scholarīoak (1916) A. E. R. Basore, Lucius Annaeus Seneca Moral Essays, London 1928–1935. Search in Google Scholarīasore (1928–1935) J. W. Arnaoutoglou, Craftsmen Associations in Roman Lydia. Search in Google ScholarĪrnaoutoglou (2011) I. My research benefited greatly from the conscientious assistance of Evelyn Bodden and her staff in the Interlibrary Loan Department in the Cohen Library in the City College of New York. The responsibility for remaining errors is mine alone. My thanks also to Rens Tacoma for helpful comments. Thanks are due to Kristina Killgrove for answering my questions about isotope studies and to Mantha Zarmakoupi for enlightening me about slave and other markets in the Delian emporion. Professor Emeritus of Economics, City College of the City University of New York. A new, positive, light is cast on the role of slave dealers who profited from reallocating labor power from less to more productive uses. Near Easterners conveyed through local and Roman slave markets were probably willing self-sellers seeking economic advancement. The totality of the evidence suggests they were not. This view is tested by examining literary, epigraphic and archaeological evidence to decide whether slave markets in the Greek East (at Acmonia, Ephesus, Magnesia on Meander, Thyatira and Delos) and in Rome itself were suitable for processing „dangerous merchandise“ (= forcible captives). Slavery by contract made it possible for individuals to overcome credit constraints limiting their ability to borrow to finance training and migration. Then it is suggested that most slaves coming to Rome at this time originated in the Greek East and that these slaves were volunteers not forcible captives. This paper begins with a brief review of evidence for migration to the relatively affluent city of Rome during the earlier Empire.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |